The summary of the story was that a landlord had allowed a tenant to pay their rent late every month, but eventually decided to evict the tenant when they were late the next month (per the lease). The tenant took the landlord to court claiming the landlord had always accepted the late rent and therefore, what was different the month he finally decided to evict her? In other words, the landlord had set a precedent of allowing late rent payments.

avatar



Comments
 
Who Zoomed
 
Related Links